Professional Indemnity

  •     Professional Disciplinary Actions and Proceedings

Nowadays many professionals are highly regulated, such as the financial professionals, insurance agents, social workers and medical doctors. Whilst serious transgressions are dealt with by criminal law, more often than not, these professionals face problems with their regulatory bodies for alleged breaches of regulatory codes committed even out of inadvertence. Our firm has in the past years been actively engaged in advising and representing clients before regulatory authorities such as:

      • The Securities and Futures Commission
      • The Law Society of Hong Kong
      • The Confederation of Insurance Brokers
      • Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants
      • The Social Workers Registration Board

Disciplinary actions by these regulatory authorities could have serious consequences to the professionals concerned and we keep this in mind when supplying clients with our advice and assistance so as to minimise any adverse impact.


  •     Alternative Dispute Resolution

Litigation is not the only way to resolve disputes nowadays. From our experience, in appropriate circumstances even the most contentious disputes can be resolved by way of other less litigious modes of dispute resolution such as arbitration, mediation, expert determination or valuation. These other options, collectively known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”), are widely recognised as being less confrontational, less formal and less time-consuming and therefore, are more cost-effective. In addition, all the proceedings are held in private and do not attract media attention.

We have both arbitrators and accredited mediators within our team of experienced lawyers. Wherever necessary and desirable, we will advise our clients to make use of ADR to their best advantage and to save costs and time.

If you would like to know more about our professional indemnity practice or how we can help you, please contact us at (852) 2810 1212 or at .

Please refer to our articles in ‘Knowledge’

Recommended Posts

Take Alternative Dispute Resolutions and Settlement Seriously
Personal Injuries claims are civil claims. Given limited judicial resources, parties to civil claims have long been encouraged to settle their disputes or switch to ways of dispute resolutions other than going to court for trial. Examples are settlement negotiations and mediation. After the Civil Justice Reform (“CJR”) in 2009, rules of civil procedures have been amended to create incentives for parties to resolve civil disputes by reaching settlement before trial, mainly by imposing adverse costs order against those who fail to consider settlement sufficiently and seriously.
Can solicitors rely on the defence of illegality when being sued for professional negligence in relation to an unlawful transaction?
In its recent judgment of Stoffel & Co. v Grondona [2020] UKSC 42, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom examined the defence of illegality in the context of a professional negligence claim. The Supreme Court held that the true rationale of the defence of illegality is that recovery should not be permitted if it would result in inconsistency and disharmony in the law, and so cause damage to the integrity of the legal system.
Whether a Sanctioned Offer Made Subject to a Condition Precedent is Still Valid?
In the recent Court of First Instance case Ryder Industries Ltd v Timely Electronics Co Ltd HCA 2358/2007 & 109/2009, the Court held that the existence of a condition precedent in an otherwise compliant sanctioned offer did not preclude it from being a valid sanctioned offer.
Back to top