Personal Insolvency

We regularly act for trustees in bankruptcy as well as creditors and debtors in personal insolvencies.

We advise trustees in bankruptcy in the performance of their duties. Creditors and debtors also seek our advice on bankruptcy procedures and options for debt restructuring.

Our work in Personal Insolvency include:

  • advising creditors on their claims against a debtor;
  • petitioning for bankruptcy of debtor;
  • acting for trustees in bankruptcy in investigations and proceedings to recover assets, void dispositions;
  • advising trustees in bankruptcy in applications for income payment orders and after-acquired property;
  • acting for debtors to set aside statutory demands and bankruptcy petitions; and
  • advising debtors on annulment of bankruptcy order.

If you would like to know more about our insolvency & restructuring practice or how we can help your business, please contact us at (852) 2810 1212 or at


Please refer to our articles in ‘Knowledge’


Recommended Posts

Which court should be the forum for transaction at an undervalue proceedings if the bankrupt’s asset is located outside Hong Kong?
In the recent case of Chan Pui Sze and Mak Hau Yin (the Joint and Several Trustees of the Property of the Bankrupt) v Wang Jue [2019] HKCFI 2515, the Court of First Instance considered whether the Hong Kong Court has jurisdiction over claims/reliefs/remedies sought in avoidance proceedings where the subject matter of the proceedings are real properties situated overseas.
How are Official Receiver’s fees calculated? An interpretation of “realisation of assets” by the court
The Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order (Cap 32C) (the “CFPO”) provides that ad valorem fees are payable to the Official Receiver on compulsory liquidation of a company. The amount of such fees, as provided in section 7(2) and Item I of Table B of Schedule 3 to the CFPO, depends, by reference to a sliding scale, on the “aggregate amount of assets realised and brought to credit by a liquidator”.
How to assess whether a series of complicated transactions entered into by a bankrupt were at an undervalue or with intent to defraud creditors?
In the recent case of Yeung Lui Ming and Lai Kar Yan v Tang Mo Lin, Irene and Cheong Tai International Holdings Limited [2019] HKCFI 1848, the Court scrutinized a series of complex transactions that disposed of the assets of a bankrupt and a company controlled by him. The transactions involved transfer of shares held by the bankrupt and sale of cemetery sites held by a company controlled by the bankrupt. The case is a good illustration of how such transactions would be assessed by the Court in the context of s.49 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6) (transactions at an undervalue) and s.60 of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (Cap. 219) (Voidability of dispositions to defraud creditors).
Back to top