The majority of successful world class companies hold large number of patents. For instance, IBM earned a record of approximately 9,100 U.S. patents in 2018, Samsung placed second with 5,850, whereas other tech giants such as Microsoft and Apple also placed in the top ten, with over 2,000 patents each.

Therefore, failure to recognize the existence or importance of patents or to handle patents issues in your business could lead to substantial loss or incur legal liability with astronomical financial consequence. For example, in 2018, Apple was awarded over US$533 million in damages for Samsung’s infringement of three of Apple’s design patents, covering various designs of the famous iPhone and iPad respectively. It is important to note that you may infringe a patent not only by making a patent product, but also selling and even using it.

We have assisted our clients in drafting over 180 patent specifications in a wide range of different sectors, including network transmission system, method of generating energy, automatic folding fan, battery adaptor, an automatic motor-output-redirection system, lead acid battery, civil engineering method, garment strength enhancement, tailoring method, chemical method for disinfection, face ID method, etc. We have also prosecuted the relevant patents in various countries including the US, Europe, PRC, South Korea, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and others.

Some of our recent work include:

  • Advising and assisting a major conglomerate in applying for and obtaining patent protection over new technologies in relation to the construction and engineering sector;
  • Filing and prosecution of patent applications in the U.S. for a local Hong Kong company in its innovative research and creations in relation to ion batteries; and
  • Drafting and filing patent PCT, EU, and New Zealand patent applications for local entrepreneurs and companies, including leading companies in environmental sciences. 

If you would like to know more about our intellectual property practice or how we can help your business, please contact us at (852) 2810 1212 or at

Please refer to our articles in ‘Knowledge’

Recommended Posts

How Can an Employer Claim Against Former Employee for Making Similar Patent Applications?
In Acron International Technology Limited v Chan Yiu Wai & Anor HCA 1709/2010 (date of judgment: 25 January 2016), the Court of First Instance delivered the first-ever judgment on section 57(1) of the Patents Ordinance. The Plaintiff succeeded in its claim against one of its former employees who had made a patent application which is similar to a technology developed by the Plaintiff after their termination of employment with the Plaintiff.
Can I continue shipping products if I am being sued for patent infringement? A summary of the Court’s considerations
In Illumina Cambridge ltd v MGI Tech Co., Ltd and Others [2021] HKCFI 3264, the Plaintiff claimed against the Defendants on the ground that the Defendants’ products and services (the “Products and Services”) infringed the Plaintiff’s Hong Kong patent (the “Patent”). The Court of First Instance rejected the Plaintiff’s application to disallow the Defendants from continuing with the transhipment of the Products and Services to their overseas customers (“Overseas Customers”) pending trial and seek disclosure of the customers and suppliers of the Defendants.
Is an Invention in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Patentable?
The ethics in the use of stem cells in research remains one of the most controversial aspects in the development and application of biological science. The recent decision of International Stem Cell Corporation v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (Case C-364/13) by the Court of Justice of the European Union in December 2014 marks an important development in European law on the issue of whether such invention is patentable. This article examines the CJEU’s decision in this case and explains its significance.
Back to top