Commercial Fraud

Commercial fraud is on the rising trend and getting more complex across the world. The term “commercial fraud” covers a wide range of activities which may give rise to various causes of actions. Each fraud is unique and requires different approaches to achieve resolution. Typically, perpetrators of commercial fraud would swiftly remit and dissipate the funds lying in the bank account to which they were first remitted to other bank accounts. Therefore, commercial fraud and asset tracing are usually intrinsically related to each other. It is always essential to take prompt actions to identify and preserve the proceeds of fraud so as to mitigate loss and damage and maximize recovery.

At ONC Lawyers, our litigation and dispute resolution team works with our well-established network of professionals including forensic accountants and offshore law firms to provide the following services to actual or potential victims of and subjects of investigations relating to commercial fraud:

  • asset tracing;
  • apply for disclosure and gagging orders;
  • applying for Mareva or freezing injunctions;
  • preserving vital documents;
  • assisting in the conduct of forensic investigations;
  • recovering misappropriated assets;
  • advising clients on investigations by and liaising with regulatory authorities such as the Commercial Crime Bureau (CCB), the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC);
  • acting for corporations in conducting internal investigations of suspected fraud;
  • advising and acting for victims of commercial fraud to report to the relevant authorities; and
  • representing clients in any subsequent prosecution and/or court proceedings.

As one of the largest independent law firms in Hong Kong, ONC Lawyers also works as part of a larger team in matters involving multi-jurisdictional or cross-border commercial fraud.

If you would like to know more about our commercial crime practice or how we can help your business, please contact us at (852) 2810 1212 or at

Please refer to our articles in ‘Knowledge’

Recommended Posts

Helping out a friend in money transactions could land you in jail
In the commercial world, it is not uncommon for people to become business partners with friends and acquaintances who share similar visions and business ideas. However, one should always exercise caution when considering whether to accept business relations with another. In the recent case of HKSAR v Man Yiu Pun [2020] HKCA 344, the District Court held a person “helping a friend out with his business” to be guilty of two money laundering charges.
Non-disclosure of conflicts of interest may be a crime – procurement staff beware
In both public and private sectors, employees of different levels might be empowered to make decisions on engagement of suppliers and contractors etc. It might be very tempting for such employee to procure contracts to be awarded to entities which he or his family members have interests. However, if no proper declaration of interest was made, such employee might be liable for fraud, conspiracy to defraud and/or misconduct in public office (if the person is a public officer).
How to assess whether a series of complicated transactions entered into by a bankrupt were at an undervalue or with intent to defraud creditors?
In the recent case of Yeung Lui Ming and Lai Kar Yan v Tang Mo Lin, Irene and Cheong Tai International Holdings Limited [2019] HKCFI 1848, the Court scrutinized a series of complex transactions that disposed of the assets of a bankrupt and a company controlled by him. The transactions involved transfer of shares held by the bankrupt and sale of cemetery sites held by a company controlled by the bankrupt. The case is a good illustration of how such transactions would be assessed by the Court in the context of s.49 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6) (transactions at an undervalue) and s.60 of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (Cap. 219) (Voidability of dispositions to defraud creditors).
Back to top