Equality remains a prominent issue in today’s business world.  It impacts all members working in a company and it needs to be tackled at all levels.  With the web of regulatory regimes becoming increasingly complex over the past several decades, it is important for companies and individuals to get an insight to the applicable anti-discrimination laws and regulations, especially the various rights and legal remedies provided therein.  In particular, in light of the growing wave of discrimination lawsuits brought by employees against employers, companies should endeavor to limit their exposure to discrimination claims and ensure their ongoing compliance with relevant laws, regulations or guidelines issued by regulatory or other authorities.

ONC provides strategic and responsive advice to help our clients deal with discrimination matters properly.  With our clients ranging from entrepreneurs, multinational companies to statutory bodies, we are dedicated to working closely with them at both local and international levels to help them create an inclusive and legally compliant workplace.   We regularly handle contentious and non-contentious work in respect of a wide range of discrimination matters across a broad swathe of industry sectors, including financial services, retail and professional services. 

Our areas of work include:

  • Pursuing and defending unlawful and unreasonable dismissal claims arising out of allegations of discrimination;
  • Reviewing remuneration, compensation and promotion practices of business groups;
  • Reviewing employment contracts, employee handbooks and other internal company policies and guidelines;
  • Advising on grievances and other complaints of discrimination, including gender and disability discrimination in the workplace;
  • Handling complaints with the Equal Opportunities Commission;
  • Assisting with investigations by regulatory authorities; and
  • Assisting with internal investigations.

If you would like to seek advice on discrimination issues, please contact us at (852) 2810 1212 or at

Please refer to our articles in ‘Knowledge’

Recommended Posts

Court of First Instance ruled that overseas married same-sex couples will qualify as “spouses” and “family members” under the Home Ownership Scheme
On 25 June 2021, the Court of First Instance (“CFI”) handed down its judgment in Ng Hon Lam Edgar v Hong Kong Housing Authority [2021] HKCFI 1812, where the CFI ruled in favour of a homosexual applicant in his judicial review against the Hong Kong Housing Authority (“HA”) in relation to HA’s policy to exclude same-sex spouses of owners of Home Ownership Scheme (“HOS”) flats from being recognised as the owners’ “spouses” and “family members”.
Will employer be liable for sexual assault by the doctor appointed to examine the employees? Latest development in vicarious liability
Under the common law doctrine of vicarious liability, a person may be liable for the negligence or other torts committed by another person. Two elements have to be shown before vicarious liability can be imposed: (1) the relationship between the two parties makes it proper for the law to make one pays for the fault of the other; and (2) there is a sufficient connection between the relationship and the fault by the tortfeasor (i.e. the wrongdoer). Historically, apart from relationships such as agency and partnership, the relationships that could give rise to vicarious liability were limited to that between an employer and an employee. Recognising that the law of vicarious liability is developing, the UK Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) considered the circumstances in which an employer may be held liable for the wrongdoings of someone who is not an employee in the recent English case of Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13.
Is Knowledge of the Mental Illness Necessary to Prove Disability Discrimination?
In this hustle and bustle city, people easily get stress from their daily work. Psychological or psychiatric illnesses have become more and more common among Hong Kong people which lead to an increasing number of claims on disability discrimination regarding mental illness in recent years. But how can an employer notice an employee is suffering from a mental illness? Is knowledge of the mental illness necessary to prove disability discrimination? Is it sufficient to prove disability discrimination if the employer only notices some of the symptoms?
Back to top