The Stock Exchange’s recommendations to the listed issuers from its review of annual report disclosure
Introduction
Disclosure in the management discussion and analysis section
1.
qualitative
discussion about the Pandemic’s effect on the operations of the listed issuer,
as well as the relevant risks or uncertainties that will have material impact
on its future performance. For example, whether there will be any suspension of
operations, disruptions to supply chains or distribution channels and change in
customers’ demands;
2.
quantitative
measures of the Pandemic’s financial or operational impact with reference to,
for example, percentage of revenue or profit, operating capacity, and
impairments to assets, loans and receivables;
3.
assessments
of liquidity positions, working capital sufficiency of the listed issuer and
its ability to fulfil financial obligations or meet debt covenants; and
4.
measures
taken or to be taken by the listed issuer to manage the impact of the Pandemic,
such as cost control, funding and adjustment to its business plans.
Financial statements with auditors’
modified opinions
The Stock Exchange identified that the
major issues giving rise to audit modifications include the existence of
material uncertainty on the listed issuers’ ability to continue as a going
concern, valuation of assets, recoverability of loans and receivables and
issues arising from limited access to accounting books and records. When the
auditors put up audit modifications in the financial statements, the following
recommended disclosure should be made in the annual reports:
1.
where
the auditors highlighted the existence of material uncertainty on the listed
issuers’ ability to continue as a going concern, the listed issuers should formulate action plans to
address the funding needs in a timely manner, and take concrete actions to
implement those plans;
2.
where
there are material changes in the financial reporting items, the listed issuers
should develop appropriate and supportable estimates, document the key
judgments and consider retaining experts where necessary. It is also
recommended to engage in early discussions and reach agreement with the
auditors in relation to the timing, form and approach of assessment of these
estimates as soon as practicable; and
3.
the
listed issuers should put in place effective internal controls to ensure the
adequate arrangements for fulfilling their financial reporting obligations, as
well as sufficient division of responsibilities instead of undue reliance on a
few employees.
Continuing connected transactions
In addition to the obligations of the listed issuers to report their continuing connected transactions (the “CCTs”) in the annual reports, independent non-executive directors (the “INEDs”) and auditors are required to review and confirm, among others, whether the transactions were made on terms that are fair and reasonable and had exceeded the annual cap which limit the aggregate size of the transactions in each financial year. In the Review, the Stock Exchange noted that in a few cases of non-compliance with the CCTs requirements, the listed issuers announced that their CCTs exceeded the annual caps or they failed to comply with the disclosure requirements on CCTs, despite the confirmations made by the INEDs and auditors that the relevant requirements have been compiled with.
The Stock Exchange reminded that INEDs
play an important role in providing checks and balance over the corporate and
business affairs of listed issuers, in particular in overseeing the connected
transactions. Listed issuers should have appropriate internal controls and
mechanisms to monitor and should provide sufficient assistance to INEDs in
overseeing their CCTs. The Stock Exchange recommended listed issuers and their INEDs to review the appropriateness of
their internal control procedures to ensure full compliance of the CCTs
requirements.
Other findings and recommendations
The Stock Exchange’s other recommendations
include:
4.
where
material assets impairments are recorded in the annual reports, disclosure
should be made on the basis of the valuation including (i) details of the value
of inputs together with the bases and assumptions; (ii) reasons for any
significant changes in the value of inputs and assumptions; (iii) the valuation
method and the reason for using that method; and (iv) an explanation of any
subsequent changes to the adopted valuation method;
5.
where
performance guarantees were given to the listed issuers in previous
acquisitions and the guarantee period ended in the financial year under review,
the required disclosure should be made in their annual reports and to publish
announcements if such guarantees were not met;
6.
where
share options are granted to non-employees, disclosure should be made as to the
identities of the grantees, terms of the share options granted and the
rationale for making the grants;
7.
the major
terms of listed issuers’ share award schemes should be disclosed (if any);
8.
meaningful,
accurate and complete disclosure on material other expense and income should be
made in order to facilitate investors’ understanding and assessment of cost structure;
9.
appropriate
disclosure of the expected use of proceeds from fund raisings should be
provided to support their future business developments, the expected time frame
and change in use of proceeds; and
10.
for
biotech issuers, additional disclosure on major business developments should be
continuously made, such as market information on post-commercialisation core
products and development of newly in-licensed or non-core products.
Conclusion
For enquiries, please feel free to contact us at: |
E: cc@onc.hk T:
(852) 2810 1212 19th Floor, Three Exchange Square, 8 Connaught
Place, Central, Hong Kong |
Important: The law and procedure on this
subject are very specialised and complicated. This article is just a very
general outline for reference and cannot be relied upon as legal advice in
any individual case. If any advice or assistance is needed, please contact
our solicitors. |
Published by ONC Lawyers © 2021 |