The MPF Offset Controversy
Background
In his 2017 policy
address, the Chief Executive proposed to progressively abolish the amount an
employer’s Mandatory Provident Fund (“MPF”)
contribution that can be used to offset long service payment or severance
payment due to an employee. This
proposal has sparked controversies. This article explores the proposals put
forward by the Chief Executive and employers’ representatives, and examines how
they could affect an employee’s entitlements.
Current MPF offsetting
mechanism
Under the current
MPF scheme, employers and employees are each required to contribute 5% of the
employee’s salary to the MPF account (subject to a cap of HK$1,500). Under the Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57), a
retiring or departing employee is entitled to long service or severance
payments. However, the current MPF
set-off mechanism allows the employer to use his MPF contribution to offset the
amount of long service payment or severance payment payable to the employee.[1]
Summary of proposals
The Chief
Executive proposed to progressively reduce the proportion of employer’s
contributions that can be used to offset long service or severance payments
over a period of 10 years (“Proposal A”)
by setting up a HK$6 billion fund to cushion the effect of the proposed
abolition to employers. Alternatively, he proposed that the government would
contribute HK$15 billion to a fund, and the employers would contribute HK$100
to 200 for each employee.
The proposals were
followed by a public consultation which ended on 18 April 2017. A final plan is due to be announced before
the end of the current government’s term.
In May, the 5 major business chambers argued for keeping the offsetting mechanism in place and proposed to increase employer’s MPF contribution to 6%, with the government contributing to a further 1% (“Proposal B”).
What are the
effects of these proposals
when compared with the current scheme?
Example – Current Scheme
Say, for example,
an employee, with a monthly salary of HK$15,000, has recently been dismissed by
his employer (by reason other than summary dismissal or redundancy) after 5
years of employment. The employee is entitled to long service payment of
HK$50,000 (i.e. HK$15,000 x 2/3 x 5 years). If the employer started making MPF
contribution from the first month of his employment, the amount contributed by
the employer in the employee’s MPF account will be HK$45,000 (i.e. HK$15,000 x
5% x 12 months x 5 years). Since the
employer is entitled to offset long service payment with his MPF contribution,
if the employer has paid long service payment to the employee in full
(HK$50,000), he may then apply to MPF trustee to withdraw the relevant amount
(HK$45,000) from the employee’s accrued benefits derived from the employer’s
contributions.
|
Monthly Salary (HK$) |
Applicable percentage |
Years |
Total
Amount (HK$) |
Long
service payment |
15,000 |
2/3 |
5 |
50,000 |
MPF
(employer’s contribution) |
15,000 |
5% |
5*12 months |
45,000 |
Proposal A
Under the government’s
proposal, the set-off mechanism will eventually be abolished. Using the above example, the employee is
entitled to long service payment of HK$50,000 and the employer is not entitled
to offset long service payment with his MPF contribution.
Proposal B
Under the proposal
by the business chambers, the employer and the government would be respectively
making 6% and extra 1% contribution towards the employee’s MPF account. Thus,
the end of the 5-year employment, the employer and the government would have
contributed HK$54,000 (i.e. HK$15,000 x 6% x 12 months x 5 years) and HK$9,000
(i.e. HK$15,000 x 1% x 12 months x 5 years) respectively.[2] The employee is still entitled to the same
long service payment of HK$50,000 when his employment is terminated after 5
years. If the employer has paid long service payment to the employee in full
(HK$50,000), he can apply to the MPF trustee for repayment of HK$50,000,
leaving HK$4,000 of the employer’s portion in the MPF account. The extra accrued benefits (government’s
portion) would also stay in the MPF account.
|
Monthly Salary (HK$) |
Applicable percentage |
Years |
Total
Amount (HK$) |
Long
service payment |
15,000 |
2/3 |
5 |
50,000 |
MPF
(employer’s contribution) |
15,000 |
6% |
5*12 months |
54,000 |
MPF
(government’s contribution) |
15,000 |
1% |
5*12 months |
9,000 |
Evaluation
Naturally,
employees would be better off under the government’s proposal. The abolition of
the offset mechanism will place a heavy financial burden on the employers. The
proposed HK$6 billion or HK$15 billion funding by the government is designed to
lessen the effect. The impact on employers is yet to be explored. We shall
revisit this topic once the final proposal by the government is released in the
end of June.
For enquiries, please contact our Litigation
& Dispute Resolution Department: |
E:
employment@onc.hk T:
(852) 2810 1212 19th Floor, Three Exchange
Square, 8 Connaught Place, Central, Hong Kong |
Important: The law and
procedure on this subject are very specialised and complicated. This article is just a very general outline for
reference and cannot be relied upon as legal advice in any individual case. If
any advice or assistance is needed, please contact our solicitors. |
Published
by ONC Lawyers ©
2017 |
[1] Offsetting of long service payment or
severance payment: If the employer has paid long service payment or severance
payment to the employee in full, he can apply to the MPF trustee for repayment
of the relevant amount from the employee’s accrued benefits derived from the
employer’s contributions. On the other
hand, if the employer has not paid the whole long service payment or severance
payment, the employee may apply to withdraw the outstanding sum from the
accrued benefits derived from employer’s contributions in his MPF account.
[2] It is assumed that both the employer and
the government started making MPF contribution from the first month of the
employee’s employment.