A review on SFC’s suitability requirement applicable to online trading platforms
Introduction
In the
report “Report on the review of licensed
corporations providing online brokerage, distribution and advisory services”
(the “Report”) issued by the
Securities and Futures Commission (the “SFC”)
in August 2022, the SFC observed that 98% of the licensed corporations (the “LCs”) surveyed provide online trading.
The SFC also observed an increasing trend to use social media platforms for
marketing and communication purposes with over 86% of surveyed LCs using
self-developed or third-party operated social media platforms, such as Weibo,
Wechat and Facebook, to interact with their clients. In view of the increasing
demand and adoption of online platforms for brokerage, distribution and
advisory services of investment products, the SFC issued “Guidelines on Online Distribution and
Advisory Platforms” (the “Guidelines”)
in July 2019 which, among the others,
provide guidance to the industry on the relevance of the sales suitability
regime in the context of online selling.
Suitability of recommendation in an online
environment
The suitability requirement applicable to
licensed or registered persons are set out in paragraph 5.2 of the Code of
Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the Securities and Futures
Commission (the “Code of Conduct”).
It denotes a regulatory standard requiring a licensed or registered person in
its recommendation of an investment product to a client, or solicitation of a
client in relation to an investment product to ensure that the recommendation
or solicitation is reasonably suitable for the particular client.
In making that assessment, the licensed or
registered person must have regard to information about the client of which he
or she is, or should be, aware through the exercise of due diligence.
In the Guidelines, the SFC makes clear that
the sale of investment products on online platforms are subject to the
suitability requirement set out in paragraph 5.2 of the Code of Conduct. The
Guidelines apply to all LCs who conduct regulated activities via online
platforms including all online channels at which the LCs transact and use for
presenting information on investment products targeted at Hong Kong investors
(hereinafter referred to as “Platform
Operators”).
Triggering of suitability requirement on
online platforms
Generally, whether a communication
regarding an investment product between LCs and their clients trigger the
suitability requirement will depend on whether there is a “solicitation” or a
“recommendation” having regard to the facts and circumstances of each interaction.
In an online environment, the context (such as the manner of presentation) and
content of product specific materials posted on an online platform coupled with
the design and overall impression created by the content of the online platform
would determine whether the suitability requirement is triggered. However, the
SFC explained in the Guidelines that the posting of factual, fair and balanced
product-specific materials would not in itself amount to a solicitation or
recommendation and will not trigger the suitability requirement, whereas the
posting of advertisements which include product-specific incentives such as
cash rebates and fee discounts would trigger the suitability requirement. This
is so in the absence of other circumstances that amount to a solicitation or
recommendation in a particular investment product. The suitability requirement would
be triggered, for example, where the online platform emphasizes some investment
products over others or there have been interactive one-to-one communications
involving solicitations or recommendations through the online platform. The SFC
sets out in the Guidelines[1]
some situations in which the suitability requirement is or is not triggered:
Situations when the |
Situations when the |
·
Posting
of advertisements with product-specific incentives (such as cash rebates or
fee discounts) for transactions in any specific product; ·
Posting
of product-specific research reports on any investment product with words
such as “Don’t Miss Out!” or “Act Now!”; ·
Persistent
pop-ups or flashing in connection with a specific investment product; ·
Presenting
a specific list of investment products with an accompanying statement such as
“product of risk rating X or below may suit you or match your risk tolerance
level” or “these products may suit you or match your risk tolerance level” to
clients immediately after the online platform conducts a risk profiling of
clients; ·
Upon
a client completing the KYC process or provision of information through a
client profiling tool, or providing updates to his or her information, the
generation of a specific model portfolio with a list of investment products
or generating a list of selected investment products which could be perceived
to be based on a consideration of the client’s information; ·
Presenting
a model portfolio that allocates a percentage of the portfolio to a class of
products (e.g., bonds) but there is only one product in that class of product
offered by the platform; and ·
Showing
the performance of a model portfolio offered by the platform against the
performance of the client’s current portfolio held with the platform without
the client requesting such a comparison. |
·
Providing a direct facility to input stock codes
to place orders for exchange-traded products for secondary market trading on
the relevant exchange; ·
Posting lists of, and providing access to,
investment products and posting factual information such as listed issuers’
corporate information (e.g., announcements, circulars or annual reports) or
providing links to such information on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong
Limited’s website or other factual information (e.g., offering documents,
notices to investors, annual reports, fact sheets, etc.); ·
Posting lists of investment products that are
selected using objective criteria (e.g., performance data, sales figures,
research data); ·
Posting advertisements of fee discounts not
tied to any specific investment product (e.g., lower subscription fees during
a client’s birthday month, time-limited reduced rates or loyalty discounts to
reduce transaction fees in general); ·
Provision of objective filters for
self-directed research on funds (e.g., geographical location, underlying
assets, performance data, risk categories and third party or in-house risk
ratings); ·
Posting of non-product specific information
such as market news or updates, industry and sector trends, and educational
materials; ·
The simple flashing of a “new” icon next to
newly published research reports (which may contain views on buy, hold or
sell with target prices) or newly issued investment products; ·
Posting model portfolios constructed using
objective criteria (e.g., research data, performance data, asset allocation
strategies / models) which are not linked to or generated based on information
provided by the client; ·
Posting statistics or trends in customer
activities involving a particular product that are factual and based on
objective criteria and do not put pressure on a client to proceed with a
transaction (for example, setting out a list of investment products with a
description that “Other clients who bought product A also looked at these products”);
and ·
Posting educational materials that are
product-specific as long as such materials do not include (standing alone or
in combination with other communications) a recommendation of the specific
investment product. |
Discharging the suitability obligations
Once the
suitability requirement is triggered, LCs must discharge the suitability requirement
at the point of sale or advice in accordance with the existing requirements
under the Code of Conduct, which cover the following aspects[2]:
·
Know your client – take all
reasonable steps to establish the true and full identity of each of its clients
and their financial situation, investment experience and objectives. Examples
include information about annual income, liquid assets or net worth in order to
assess the clients’ financial situation, the types of investment products in
which the clients have invested and the periods over which investments in such
products have occurred in order to assess the clients’ investment experience,
etc. LCs can discharge this requirement by making reasonable efforts to obtain
information from clients;
·
Product due diligence – understand
the investment products they recommend to clients and conduct due diligence
work in selecting appropriate investment products for each client. When
conducting product due diligence, apart from understanding the nature and
extent of risks of the investment products, LCs may need to consider market and
industry risks, economic and political environments, regulatory restrictions
and any other factors which may directly or indirectly impact on risk return
profiles and growth prospects of investments depending on the nature of the
investment products;
·
Product matching – provide
reasonably suitable recommendations to clients by matching the risk return
profile of each investment product with the personal circumstances of each
client. In doing so, LCs should use their professional judgement to assess
diligently whether the characteristics and risk exposures of each recommended
investment product (including transaction costs, effect of gearing and foreign
currency risks, where appropriate) are actually suitable for the client and are
in the best interests of the client, taking into account the client’s
investment objectives, investment horizon, investment knowledge and experience,
risk tolerance, and financial situation, etc.;
·
provide all relevant material
information to clients and assist them in making informed investment decisions,
for example, by providing each client with the recommended investment products’
up-to-date prospectuses or offering circulars and other up-to-date documents
relevant to the investment, giving proper and fair explanations to client as to
why the recommended investment products are suitable and the nature and extent
of risks the investment products bear, etc.;
·
employ competent staff and
provide appropriate training (the competency requirement also applies to the
appointment of agents, consultants, contractors and similar arrangements); and
·
document and retain the reasons
for each investment recommendation given to each client.
In discharging
the suitability requirement in the context of online selling, Platform Operators
should also note in particular (but not exclusively) the following obligations where
applicable:
·
act diligently and carefully in
providing any advice and ensuring that advice and recommendations are based on
thorough analysis and take into account available alternatives (for example,
availability of any similar investment products which may be less costly);
·
when providing investment
advice to clients, Platform Operators should not take commission rebates or
other benefits as the primary basis for soliciting or recommending particular
investment products to client;
·
establish a proper mechanism to
assess the suitability of investment products via their online platforms. Such
mechanism should be holistic (i.e., all relevant factors concerning the
personal circumstances of a client, including concentration risk, should be
taken into account); and
·
have in place appropriate tools
for assessing a client’s concentration risk and such an assessment should be
based on the information about the client obtained by the Platform Operators
through its know-your-client
process and any investment portfolio held with the Platform Operators.
Other points to note
Robo-advice
It is important to note that the Guidelines apply to
robo-advice (i.e. automated portfolio construction or model portfolios based on
a client’s personal circumstances) provided directly to clients in an online
environment using technology tools (i.e. client facing tools). Platform
Operators giving robo-advice via client facing tool also need to comply with
the suitability requirement at the point advice is given. Algorithms should not
therefore be programmed to direct clients towards particular investment
products for which the robo-adviser or its affiliates receive higher
commissions or other types of compensation. Similar to the above, robo-advisers
are subject to, among others, the following obligations:
·
Information for clients - ensure that the
investment advisory services offered are accurately described and that sufficient
information is provided to investors prior to client on-boarding to allow
investors to make an informed decision on whether to employ the robo-adviser’s
services. This should include information on the limitations, risks and how key
components of its services are generated (e.g. a description of how underlying
algorithms operate, any limitations on the algorithm, how a portfolio
rebalancing mechanism works and the associated risks). Investors should also be informed of the
degree of human involvement provided (e.g. advice via web-chat);
·
Client profiling - design client profiling
tools or questionnaires in order to obtain sufficient information (including,
where appropriate, the opportunity for clients to provide additional
explanatory and contextual information) to enable the robo-adviser to provide
advice that is suitable based on clients’ personal circumstances and put in
place proper mechanisms to identify and reconcile inconsistent information
provided by clients (e.g., by alerting clients to inconsistencies through popup
boxes and allowing the information to be altered, or internally flagging
inconsistent information for review and follow-up);
·
System design and development - effectively
manages and adequately supervises the design, development, deployment and
operations of algorithms used in digital-advice tools and maintain appropriate
documentation concerning the design and development (including modifications)
of all algorithms, including their rationale and maintain documented manuals
concerning the scope and strategy for the testing of algorithms and records of
testing conducted and test results; and
·
Supervision and testing of
algorithms - supervise the operation and testing of the
algorithms that form the basis of any investment advice it provides (for
example, having a documented plan with details on the scope and strategy for
the testing, having security measures in place to prevent and detect
unauthorized access to the algorithms, etc.).
If client facing tools are not involved,
Platform Operators should refer to the requirements applicable to their conduct
of regulated activities under the Code of Conduct, etc.
Additional
protective measures for unsolicited sales of
complex products on online platforms
The Guidelines require Platform Operators to ensure that any
transaction in a complex product (which is defined as an investment product
whose terms, features and risks are not reasonably likely to be understood by a
retail investor because of its complex structure) is suitable for the client in
all the circumstances[3].This obligation should be
discharged to the standard applicable to paragraph 5.2 of the Code of Conduct.
For the avoidance of doubt, the suitability requirement applies to complex
products (except for derivatives traded on an exchange where paragraph 6.5 of
the Guidelines is applicable) even where the materials posted online would not
otherwise trigger the suitability requirement and no recommendation or advice
is given or offered, though Platform Operators dealing with Institutional
Professional Investors (as defined in the Code of Conduct) are automatically
exempt from the suitability requirement.
Takeaway
Platform Operators or those considering
digitalising parts of their business should take note and evaluate the current
frameworks for compliance with the Code of Conduct and other relevant
guidelines.
For enquiries,
please feel free to contact us at: |
E: cc@onc.hk T:
(852) 2810 1212 19th Floor, Three Exchange Square, 8 Connaught Place, Central, Hong
Kong |
Important: The law and procedure on
this subject are very specialised and
complicated. This article is just a very general outline for reference and
cannot be relied upon as legal advice in any individual case. If any advice
or assistance is needed, please contact our solicitors. |
Published by ONC Lawyers © 2023 |
[1] Question 15
of the “Frequently Asked Questions on the Guidelines
on Online Distribution and Advisory Platforms and Paragraph 5.5 of the Code of
Conduct” issued by the SFC
[2] Frequently Asked Questions on Compliance with
Suitability Obligations by Licensed or Registered Person” issued by
the SFC on 23 December 2016
[3] Paragraph 6.3 of the “Guidelines on Online Distribution and Advisory
Platforms” issued by the SFC” in July 2019