Introduction

Arbitration in Hong Kong is mainly conducted through the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (the “HKIAC”), which stipulates a structured set of procedures designed to ensure fairness, efficiency, consistency and clarity throughout the arbitration process. This article provides an overview of the commencement procedures in arbitration administered by the HKIAC, and highlights certain procedures that may enhance efficiency of the arbitration proceedings.

Commencement of arbitration

According to Article 4 of the 2024 HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules (the “Rules”), the arbitration process officially begins when the Claimant submits a Notice of Arbitration (the “Notice”) to the HKIAC and the Respondent. The date of receipt by the HKIAC marks the commencement of the arbitration. The Notice must include:

1.      a request to submit the dispute to arbitration;

2.      the names, addresses, telephone, fax numbers, and/or email addresses of the parties and their representatives;

3.      a copy of the arbitration agreement;

4.      a copy of the relevant contracts or legal documents in dispute;

5.      a description of the nature of the claim and the amount involved, if any;

6.      the relief or remedy sought;

7.      proposed number of arbitrators (one or three), if no prior agreement between the parties;

8.      Claimant’s proposal and any comments regarding the number of arbitrators;

9.      disclosure of any third-party funding; and

10.   confirmation of service of the Notice.

Within 30 days of receiving the Notice, the Respondent must respond, addressing the claims and proposing arbitrators if applicable. Any counterclaims or defences should also be included. 

Appointment and confirmation of arbitrators

The arbitration can be conducted by a sole arbitrator or three arbitrators. If the parties do not agree on the number of arbitrators before commencement of the arbitration or within 30 days from the date the Notice is received by the Respondent, HKIAC will determine this issue based on the circumstances of the case.

Nomination process

For proceedings with a sole arbitrator, parties must jointly nominate within 30 days of the Respondent receiving the Notice. If the decision is made after the arbitration begins, this period shortens to 15 days. 

As for proceedings with three arbitrators, each party nominates one arbitrator in their respective submissions, with a third arbitrator (presiding) nominated by the two chosen arbitrators.

If parties fail to nominate within the deadlines, HKIAC will appoint the arbitrators. The Rules emphasises party autonomy while also promoting diversity in arbitrator appointments.

Qualifications and ethical standards

Arbitrators must meet independence and impartiality standards. Restrictions are placed on the nationality of the sole or presiding arbitrator in cases where parties are from different jurisdictions unless waived by both parties. Arbitrators must also disclose any potential conflicts of interest immediately upon their appointment.

Seat vs venue

The seat of arbitration refers to the legal jurisdiction governing the arbitration process, while the venue is the physical location where hearings and discussions occur. Unless otherwise agreed, the seat is Hong Kong, but hearings can take place elsewhere if mutually decided.

Statements of claim and defence

If the initial Notice does not include a Statement of Claim, the Claimant shall submit one within a timeline set by the tribunal. Similarly, the Respondent must provide a Statement of Defence within the designated time. Both parties are required to attach supporting materials relevant to their claims or defence.

Procedures to enhance efficiency

The HKIAC has established flexible procedural mechanisms in the Rules to enhance the efficiency of arbitration proceedings. Two key processes introduced are bifurcation of proceedings under Article 13.6 and early determination under Article 43 of the Rules.

Bifurcation of proceedings

Definition and purpose

Article 13.6 of the Rules empowers the arbitral tribunal to bifurcate proceedings, which involves dividing the arbitration into separate stages to address preliminary issues that could potentially resolve part or all of the case. This allows for a more focused examination of specific issues without the need to address every element of the dispute simultaneously.

Process

·           Discretion of the tribunal: The tribunal has the discretion to decide whether to bifurcate proceedings after consulting with the parties involved. This ensures that the interests and views of both parties are considered.

·           Sequential stages: The tribunal can conduct the arbitration in sequential stages, determining which issues should be resolved first based on their significance to the overall case.

·           Efficiency: By allowing the tribunal to adopt procedures that prioritise the resolution of certain key issues, bifurcation aims to enhance the efficiency of the arbitration process and potentially facilitate the overall resolution of the dispute.

Early determination

Definition and purpose

Article 43 of the Rules introduces a significant procedure enabling parties to seek a determination on specific points of law or fact before the final award is rendered. It is designed to accelerate arbitration by addressing issues that are clearly unsustainable at an early stage.

Conditions

Parties can request early determination if a point of law or fact is:

·           manifestly without merit;

·           manifestly outside the tribunal’s jurisdiction; or

·           such that even if assumed to be correct, no award could be rendered in favour of the submitting party.

Process

·           Request submission: A party seeking early determination must submit a request that includes a statement of the relevant facts and legal arguments, a proposal for the form of the early determination procedure, and comments on how this aligns with the objectives of avoiding unnecessary delays and ensuring fair treatment of both parties.

·           Timely Resolution: The tribunal shall, subject to agreement of the parties to extend the time limit, either dismiss or allow the request for early determination within 30 days of filing such request, promoting efficiency in the arbitration process.

Takeaway

The Rules offer a comprehensive and structured framework that balances party autonomy with active case management by the tribunal. From commencement of proceedings and appointment of arbitrators, to bifurcation and early determination mechanisms, the Rules are designed to minimise unnecessary delay and costs while preserving fairness and due process. Ultimately, the Rules facilitate timely and efficient resolution of complex disputes.

 

For enquiries, please feel free to contact us at:

E: arbitration@onc.hk                                                         T: (852) 2810 1212 W: www.onc.hk                                                                    F: (852) 2804 6311 19th Floor, Three Exchange Square, 8 Connaught Place, Central, Hong Kong

Important: The law and procedure on this subject are very specialised and complicated. This article is just a very general outline for reference and cannot be relied upon as legal advice in any individual case. If any advice or assistance is needed, please contact our solicitors.

Published by ONC Lawyers © 2026